In economics, a multiplier is a factor of proportionality that measures how much an endogenous variable changes in response to a change in some exogenous variable.
For example, suppose a oneunit change in some variable x causes another variable y to change by M units. Then the multiplier is M.
Common uses
Two multipliers are commonly discussed in introductory macroeconomics.
Money multiplier
In monetary macroeconomics and banking, the money multiplier measures how much the money supply increases in response to a change in the monetary base. The multiplier may vary across countries, and will also vary depending on what measures of money are considered. For example, consider M2 as a measure of the U.S. money supply, and M0 as a measure of the U.S. monetary base. If a $1 increase in M0 by the Federal Reserve causes M2 to increase by $10, then the money multiplier is 10.
Fiscal multipliers
Multipliers can be calculated to analyze the effects of fiscal policy, or other exogenous changes in spending, on aggregate output.
For example, if an increase in German government spending by 100, with no change in taxes, causes German GDP to increase by 150, then the spending multiplier is 1.5. Other types of fiscal multipliers can also be calculated, like multipliers that describe the effects of changing taxes (such as lumpsum taxes or proportional taxes).
Keynesian and HansenSamuelson multipliers
Keynesian economists often calculate multipliers that measure the effect on aggregate demand only. (To be precise, the usual Keynesian multiplier formulas measure how much the IS curve shifts left or right in response to an exogenous change in spending.)
American Economist Paul Samuelson credited Alvin Hansen for the inspiration behind his seminal 1939 contribution. The original Samuelson multiplieraccelerator model (or, as he belatedly baptised it, the "HansenSamuelson" model) relies on a multiplier mechanism that is based on a simple Keynesian consumption function with a Robertsonian lag:
 C_{t} = c_{0} + cY_{t1}
so present consumption is a function of past income (with c as the marginal propensity to consume). Investment, in turn, is assumed to be composed of three parts:
 I_{t} = I_{0} + I(r) + b (C_{t}  C_{t1})
The first part is autonomous investment, the second is investment induced by interest rates and the final part is investment induced by changes in consumption demand (the "acceleration" principle). It is assumed that 0 I_{t} = I_{0} + b (C_{t}  C_{t1}) Now, assuming away government and foreign sector, aggregate demand at time t is:
 Ytd = C_{t} + I_{t} = c_{0} + I_{0} + cY_{t1} + b (C_{t}  C_{t1})
assuming goods market equilibrium (so Y_{t} = Ytd), then in equilibrium:
 Y_{t} = c_{0} + I_{0} + cY_{t1} + b (C_{t}  C_{t1})
But we know the values of C_{t} and C_{t1} are merely C_{t} = c_{0} + cY_{t1} and C_{t1} = c_{0} + cY_{t2} respectively, then substituting these in:
 Y_{t} = c_{0} + I_{0} + cY_{t1} + b (c_{0} + cY_{t1}  c_{0}  cY_{t2})
or, rearranging and rewriting as a second order linear difference equation:
 Y_{t}  (1 + b )cY_{t1} + b cY_{t2} = (c_{0} + I_{0})
The solution to this system then becomes elementary. The equilibrium level of Y (call it Y_{p}, the particular solution) is easily solved by letting Y_{t} = Y_{t1} = Y_{t2} = Y_{p}, or:
 (1  c  b c + b c)Y_{p} = (c_{0} + I_{0})
so:
 Y_{p} = (c_{0} + I_{0})/(1c)
The complementary function, Y_{c} is also easy to determine. Namely, we know that it will have the form Y_{c} = A_{1}r_{1}t + A_{2}r_{2}t where A_{1} and A_{2} are arbitrary constants to be defined and where r_{1} and r_{2} are the two eigenvalues (characteristic roots) of the following characteristic equation:
 r^{2}  (1+b )cr + b c = 0
Thus, the entire solution is written as Y = Y_{c} + Y_{p}
Opponents of Keynesianism have sometimes argued that Keynesian multiplier calculations are misleading; for example, according to the theory of Ricardian equivalence, it is impossible to calculate the effect of deficitfinanced government spending on demand without specifying how people expect the deficit to be paid off in the future.
General method
The general method for calculating longrun multipliers is called comparative statics. That is, comparative statics calculates how much one or more endogenous variables change in the long run, given a permanent change in one or more exogenous variables. The comparative statics method is an application of the Implicit Function Theorem.
Dynamic multipliers can also be calculated. That is, one can ask how a change in some exogenous variable in year t affects endogenous variables in year t, in year t+1, in year t+2, and so forth.^{[1]} A graph showing the impact on some endogenous variable, over time (that is, the multipliers for times t, t+1, t+2, etcetera), is called an impulseresponse function.^{[2]} The general method for calculating impulse response functions is sometimes called comparative dynamics.
History
Quesnay]], 1759. The tableau conomique (Economic Table) of Fran ois Quesnay (1759), which lay the foundation of the Physiocrats economic theory, is credited as the "first precise formulation" of interdependent systems in economics and the origin of multiplier theory.^{[3]} In the tableau conomique, one sees variables in one period (time t) feeding into variables in the next period (time t+1), and a constant rate of flow yields geometric series, which computes a multiplier.
The modern theory of the multiplier was developed in the 1930s, by Kahn, Keynes, Giblin, and others,^{[4]} following earlier work in the 1890s by the Australian economist Alfred De Lissa, the Danish economist Julius Wulff, and the GermanAmerican economist N. A. J. L. Johannsen.^{[5]}
Critiques
Economist Robert Barro believes that the Keynesian multiplier is close to zero. For every dollar the government borrows and spends, spending elsewhere in the economy falls by almost the same amount.^{[6]}
See also
References

↑ James Hamilton (1994), Time Series Analysis, Chapter 1, page 2. Princeton University Press.

↑ Helmut L tkepohl (2008), 'Impulse response function'. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd. ed.

↑ The multiplier theory, by Hugo Hegeland, 1954, p. 1

↑ The Economic record, by the Economic Society of Australia and New Zealand, 1962, p. 74

↑ The origins of the Keynesian revolution, by Robert William Dimand, p. 117
 ↑
